YogiSource.com my account | view cart | customer service
 Search:    
Welcome to the new Yoga.com Forums home!
For future visits, link to "http://www.YogiSource.com/forums".
Make a new bookmark.
Tell your friends so they can find us and you!

Coming soon ... exciting new changes for our website, now at YogiSource.com.

Search | Statistics | User Listing View All Forums
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )



Sanskrit: Do you get it?
Moderators: Moderators

Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Yoga -> General YogaMessage format
 
yogi-boy
Posted 2005-03-25 11:19 PM (#20080)
Subject: Sanskrit: Do you get it?


Whats up with sanskrit.

I never get any of the words right, so I've even given up trying to remember them. Most of my classes don't know the one from the other unless I call postures by their english names.

No disrespect to the origins of yoga, but surely we can move the language into the 21century.

It eventually sounds like technical-jargon mechanics use to rip-off clients with. I found the same to be true when I refer to the muscular system by their latin names. Telling a class to tuck in their rectus abdominus usually scares the hell out of them until you explain its those vertical stomach muscles.

When other yogis start talking Sanskrit to me I usually glaze over and agree, hoping I'm not committing myself to anything too obscure. I've eventually come to the point I'm making my classes as accessible to as many people as possible without losing the fundamental value of what yoga offers its practitioners.

Namaste!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
easternsun
Posted 2005-03-26 4:59 AM (#20083 - in reply to #20080)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?


yogi-boy said:
It eventually sounds like technical-jargon mechanics use to rip-off clients with.

are you serious? why would it be ripping people off to teach them the authentic names/language in which yoga was born? would that not add value to the program?

learning the names does take a little bit of effort. i teach my students both the sanskrit and their language - they can decide which one they prefer to learn. you can use tricks to do it -

garudasana . i tell them that it is eagle in english, washi in japanese. i try to give them a trick to remember the name. garuda is the official airline of indonesia. the next class, there is a good chance they will remember one of those things and be able to come up with a name.

dont you think that it makes you sound more knowledgable about your job if you can demonstrate that you know the latin and the english or the sanskrit and the english?

you said: No disrespect to the origins of yoga, but surely we can move the language into the 21century.

can i ask you why you want to fix something that is clearly not broken?

yoga is accessible by all and saying the names in both languages does not de-value it. i actually think that learning the sanskrit is really important - it is one of those little things that might lead one toward the path of studying the eight limbs of ashtanga instead of just heading to a class once a week.

sorry this is a touchy subject with me! yesterday i found hermes yoga mats and louis vuitton yoga mat bags and dolce & gabbana "i love yoga" $100 undershirts (that are totally inappropriate for yoga btw ) no, i did not make it to chanel or dior - but they probably have yoga stuff there too!

what would the great sages of yoga think of what it has become

i have a different problem. i dont know the names in english! i have to look them up all the time.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Kabu
Posted 2005-03-26 10:26 AM (#20094 - in reply to #20080)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?


As a beginner, I don't mind learning the Sanskrit names of poses. Fortunately, our teachers use both English and Sanskrit, so we learn a little at a time.

I do tend to refer to poses in English only though. When I was first introduced to Yoga, I found a Yahoo Yoga chat group and lurked for a few weeks. Though many people were very cool, there were a few Yoga-Nazis who were less than pleasant. They had very definite ways of doing things, and God forbid one should stray (like...using English terms for the asanas). Even using the word "pose" pissed them off. And whenever someone would mention a well known teacher (for example, Baron Baptiste), they would verbally rip him or her apart. Quite a nasty atmosphere. It almost turned me off Yoga altogether until I reminded myself this is a community like any other, and you'll always have difficult people no matter where you go.

Anyway, that's always stayed with me.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
tourist
Posted 2005-03-26 11:51 AM (#20102 - in reply to #20080)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?



Expert Yogi

Posts: 8442
50002000100010010010010025
A couple of comments - first of all I don't believe Sanskrit is a dead language. As I understand, it is a language that is alive and well and used more extensively than Latin is in English speaking countries. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong - I was once

Also, if you can name the muscles of the body in Latin, you are capable of adding a bit of Sanskrit. It is quite logical and when you break it down, it is pretty easy. I learned the names of the poses by writing down my practice every day. It only took a minute or so and it had the benefit of giving me a record of what I had done. I actually still keep a little book with my practices although I have developed some shorthand (AMS is Adho Mukha Svanasana).

Some people will NEVER learn the names of the poses (or have difficulty at best) either in English or Sanskrit. Visual learners and people with even slight processing problems just don't get it that way. I have a friend who has been taking classes nearly as long as I have (not as extensively but still, pretty regular) who does have a bit of a problem processing language. She can't tell me the name of a pose unless she can move while describing it - it comes out "you know, the one where we go like this and then move our arms like this." And then I tell her the name and she says "Yes, that one!" So while it is good to tell the names of the poses in Sanskrit and English (or whatever language your classes speak - big challenge for Kira!) demostrating will always be the best learning tool for some.

And I qualify all this by saying that I am a person who enjoys words and language. If that's not your thing, it will be more of a challenge. Being around people who almost always use the Sanskrit names helps a lot and I am lucky to belong to a big yoga community where I get the chance to talk yoga regularly.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
kulkarnn
Posted 2005-03-26 5:08 PM (#20127 - in reply to #20080)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?


Dear Yogi-boy and others interested:

I agree with Yogi Boy that if you are interested in knowing ONLY the Yoga Pose from physical point of view or doing an exercise, there is NO need to know the Sanskrit Names. In my Yoga Exercise class, I do NOT give any names. For Names, I teach a separate class to those who are very interested. Also, I think it is a waste of time of exercise class when students are not needing, not getting and are not interested in names. And, of course, knowing the name does NOT make the exercise any better, not even a bit.

Now, having said that, I must emphasise this: Without knowing proper Sanskrit, it is almost next to IMPOSSIBLE to get the entire Yoga and Veda Philosophy. And, that is what the world famous Yoga Teachers in the Western World are struggling with, and also some Indian including World Famous teachers are struggling with. If you wish to experience this, you may watch one of my Patanjali lecture videos and see how the interpretations of Sanskrit Words are given wrongly, especially in the case of Western Authors. Let me give one example, with no offense: yoga chittavritti nirodah... patanjali 2/1. Yoga is defined as 'Stopping the waves in the mind stuff'. Mind Stuff? ETC.

Anyway, to understand the philosophy, one must attempt to a) get it from a Sanskrit Scholar b) attempt to know the Sanskrit involved as much as possible c) and then verify the understanding to be correct from an appropriate source.

Peace
Neel Kulkarni
www.authenticyoga.org
Top of the page Bottom of the page
tourist
Posted 2005-03-26 6:29 PM (#20129 - in reply to #20127)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?



Expert Yogi

Posts: 8442
50002000100010010010010025
Neel - I think not giving the Sanskrit names does somewhat of a disservice to those students who could learn easily by just listening. >>Without knowing proper Sanskrit, it is almost next to IMPOSSIBLE to get the entire Yoga and Veda Philosophy. << I think you are probably correct with this yet wouldn't it be nice for students to be able to begin this understanding by starting to get the sound of the language right from the beginning? Then of course they have to pay for a separate class to learn what they might have picked up for free at asana class!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
kulkarnn
Posted 2005-03-26 9:05 PM (#20141 - in reply to #20080)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?


Yes Dear Tourist. I am not against giving out Sanskrit Names. I am against mixing it up with Yoga Exercise class in such a way that it is a part of instruction as an important part, so that the student focuses on name rather than the pose/exercise.

Also, yes. As long as the philosophical understanding of the Sanskrit Related literature has come from the correct source, it can be given in English during Asana Class.

Of course, in my class, I like to separate Asana from the philsophy from Chanting, and Meditation. I mean, I do them together in one sitting, but in different time slots.

Neel Kulkarni
www.authenticyoga.org
Top of the page Bottom of the page
yogi-boy
Posted 2005-03-26 10:22 PM (#20151 - in reply to #20080)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?


>> sounds like technical-jargon << I meant most people don't understand, not that yoga was ripping poeple off.

I find the majority of people in my classes don't really care for the Sanskrit. I've also noticed the fellow yoga-teachers who do use it, use it in such a way to show off their higher-levels of understanding. Y'know what they say: there's no bore like a wine bore.

Big deal if I got the Latin, my classes haven't and they prefer the common words for body parts.

I'm wondering, if my class can't tell Tadasana from mountain pose; why confuse them?

Respect!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Bay Guy
Posted 2005-03-26 10:32 PM (#20153 - in reply to #20151)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?



Expert Yogi

Posts: 2479
2000100100100100252525
Location: A Blue State
yogi-boy - 2005-03-26 10:22 PM

Y'know what they say: there's no bore like a wine bore.

!


Yeah, but I don't mind if one of those folks invites me to dinner, am I right?

Top of the page Bottom of the page
tourist
Posted 2005-03-27 10:36 AM (#20184 - in reply to #20151)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?



Expert Yogi

Posts: 8442
50002000100010010010010025
Neel - I agree with not mixing philosophy and asana for sure. My teachers do mix it in a bit, but then I am attending classes with very experienced students (much more experienced than myself) and it is not done in a pedantic way. Sometimes in a pose we'll hear, "remember, Patanjali says...XXX" but we save the real philosophy for a separate part of class or a separate class.

Yogi-boy - yes, the folks that try to be clever with the Sanskrit will be like that no matter what. The "wine bore" is a classic example! But as we've discussed here before, using the Sanskrit names for the poses when discussing asana is actually more clear than using English because of the variations in how people name the poses. Like "fixed firm" in Bikram. I had to read between the lines a lot and do some thinking to figure out that it was supta virasana. Most people say "reclined hero pose" in English.

As far as the Latin goes, I find it is really common to use some Latin words like sternum and sacrum (and we point them out so people know what we mean) and some English, like collarbones. My guess is that we say sternum and sacrum to be really clear about the body part. I know there can be confusion for example, with sacrum and tailbone for beginners (plus they can't see their sacrum on themselves) whereas collarbones are pretty clear and easily defined and seen. I like to use some of the "fancier" Latin names like the ischeal tuberosities and the anterior superior ileac spines for some comic relief when I slow down to give the class a breather. Try offering to help students find their ischeal tuberosities if things are getting too serious
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Kabu
Posted 2005-03-27 10:43 AM (#20185 - in reply to #20184)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?


I knew I had the right teacher for me when she told the class during Bridge, "You can use a block here to help support you. Place it right where...right near...uh...your Gluteal Crease."
Top of the page Bottom of the page
tourist
Posted 2005-03-27 10:45 AM (#20187 - in reply to #20185)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?



Expert Yogi

Posts: 8442
50002000100010010010010025
Yes! I finally found it in Gray's Anatomy - there they call it the Gluteal Fold but same difference, eh? One of my teachers says "the top of the Great Divide."
Top of the page Bottom of the page
kulkarnn
Posted 2005-03-27 12:45 PM (#20202 - in reply to #20080)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?


Dear Yogi-Boy:
In my Yoga Exercise Class, mostly, I do not even use English Names such as Mountan Pose, Cobra Pose, etc. I just tell them what they need to do. I can not avoid the body part names though. Some times, especially when Spanish community is around, I also show them what is exactly meant by an elbow while other English Scholars laught at me.

Neel Kulkarni
www.authenticyoga.org
Top of the page Bottom of the page

Posted 2005-03-27 1:00 PM (#20206 - in reply to #20202)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?


I just GOTTA get to a Brother Neel class before he packs up for the the subcontinent!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
willowyogamamma
Posted 2005-03-28 9:55 PM (#20363 - in reply to #20080)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?


Okay, I'm new to this forum but not new to yoga or to the site and don't really want to start off on the wrong foot, however I feel moved by this enough to post for the first time.

Sanskrit is a beautiful complex language that in itself is a meditation. I was fortunate to take a class on Sanskrit locally, going over the alphabet, studying pronunciation of each symbol, each word and left each class vibrating. It's a powerful language that can uplift you as high as you have ever dreamed you could be. 'Updating the language to the 21st century' is losing sight on the purpose of the whole thing. As popular as yoga has become, it shouldn't be treated as a fad. It takes discipline, and love. Why dumb it down? By making it important to you, it will either become important to your students or it wont. It's that simple.

I think that's enough of a start for now.

Top of the page Bottom of the page
tourist
Posted 2005-03-28 10:01 PM (#20367 - in reply to #20363)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?



Expert Yogi

Posts: 8442
50002000100010010010010025
Iris - what a lovely name! And a lovely screen name, too Sanskrit is a beautiful language, I agree. It lends itself to chanting in much the same way Latin lends itself to singing. Very uplifting. Welcome!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Bay Guy
Posted 2005-03-28 10:04 PM (#20368 - in reply to #20367)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?



Expert Yogi

Posts: 2479
2000100100100100252525
Location: A Blue State


"....Chidananda rupo, Shivoham, Shivoham..."

Top of the page Bottom of the page
Thushara
Posted 2005-03-28 10:34 PM (#20382 - in reply to #20367)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?


tourist - 2005-03-29 9:01 AM

Iris - what a lovely name! And a lovely screen name, too Sanskrit is a beautiful language, I agree. It lends itself to chanting in much the same way Latin lends itself to singing. Very uplifting. Welcome!


Iris Iris is a Greek godess for messaging
I have the most complicated situation here.. We refer to Yoga poses in Sanskrit names.. And I refer English names too.. My teacher is Tamil and her teacher was Tamil too., for some of the Sanskrit names she use different Pronunciation.. So I have to put quite a lot of effort in understanding.. Soem times they are Tamil words , But I’m confused with Sanskrit as both languages have some sort of similarity. To make matters worst.. My 2 new students speak only Snhala language.. so I have to explain the Sanskrit names in Sinhala as well for them to understand it better.. Ohh .. I put 2 times of effort to overcome this language issues than you guys do, as people in my country speak 3 different languages.. + its Sanskrit for yoga

So far so good !! Its challenging.. Any way I love Sanskrit



Edited by Thushara 2005-03-28 10:35 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
tourist
Posted 2005-03-28 11:14 PM (#20386 - in reply to #20382)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?



Expert Yogi

Posts: 8442
50002000100010010010010025
Thushara - it makes all of us unilingual types look pretty lame, doesn't it? North Americans think everyone should speak English - or at least understand us if we ... speak .. . slow ... ly ... enough! :lol:

Edited by tourist 2005-03-28 11:15 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
MrD
Posted 2005-04-01 7:50 PM (#20889 - in reply to #20080)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?


Ah yes. This the old Shall we use dead but time honored languages verses the modern "Vulgar" or common language.

There are a few basic facts that need to be understood.

1. Sanskrit, like Latin is no longer used in everyday life, is is generally exclusive to religious/ ceremonial actions.

2. When most of the names of Asanas were created, they were often descriptive and simply referred to the action, or animal look that they represented. A few others like Haumanasana are reflective of Hindu Mythology.

3. Even the sanskrit names are not consistent. See the following link for different names given to the same breathing techniques in Pranayama.
http://www.yogajournal.com/practice/673_1.cfm

4. Only after the passage of time when the common usage of the words fades does a language become compartmentalized into a sacred language.

5. Once a language becomes less understood, but more honored, the focus shifts more on the mood and sound of the words, the ceremony as it were, rather than its informational message.


In the Western World, Latin, Koine Greek, and Hebrew with occasional Aramaic, Syriac, and Armenian were all Sacred languages. While they allowed people from cultures all across the "known" world to converse, they become languages consigned to scholars and clerics. It was incomprehensible to most members of society. Dante broke that barrier when he published the Inferno in his "Vulgar Tounge" -- the Florentine dialect of Italian, the direct descendant of modern Italian. Martin Luther also broke a similar barrier for Germans when he translated the Bible into High German thereby relegating Low German (the one most directly related to English) to secondary status. The same thing happened with various English Bible translations, like Tyndale's. Bloody Mary's Bible was the Latin Vulgate. Queen Elizabeth's was Tyndale's.

One of the large issues of the Reform vs the Counter Reform was the ability to use French for the French, German for the Germans, and English for the English. The test of time came down on the side of the reformers. Early for those countries who adopted Protestant teachings, and later, the 1960's, for the Catholic world.

We have similar language exclusivity today in technobabble, govermental gobbledygook, and legalese. To say nothing of the worst offender -- the language of Medicine.

I prefer the simple over the complex. Give me understandable English names over the incomprehensible Sanskrit.

But of course I don't want candles or incense in my yoga practice either.

Edited by MrD 2005-04-01 8:16 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Gruvemom
Posted 2005-04-01 8:02 PM (#20892 - in reply to #20080)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?


As an American I prefer the comprehensible. Give me the English names over the incomprehensible Sanskrit. <
Top of the page Bottom of the page
jeansyoga
Posted 2005-04-01 8:02 PM (#20893 - in reply to #20080)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?


I don't use the Sanskrit names for poses, simply because I cannot remember them!

Does anyone know of a good method for learning and memorizing the Sanskrit? I'm really struggling here!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Bay Guy
Posted 2005-04-01 9:41 PM (#20910 - in reply to #20893)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?



Expert Yogi

Posts: 2479
2000100100100100252525
Location: A Blue State
For most asanas, I find myself moving more and more toward Sanskrit names.
That's part because a lot of the poses I practice just don't have good English names,
but I'm an outlier in that regard. For some poses, of course, it's just *too much* easier to
use English. Handstand is simpler that Adho Mukha Vrksasana, and DownDog and
UpDog just flow off the tongue. Still, can any of you tell me the English name for
Vamadevasana I or Gherandasana I or Kapinjalasana or Kapilasana or Kasyapasana?
Sometimes the Sanskrit name is the THE NAME of the pose.

Anyway, here's a link that defines some of the Sanskrit terms (including the
poses named for sages that I just listed).

http://www.expressionsofspirit.com/yoga/sanskrit-names.htm
Top of the page Bottom of the page
tourist
Posted 2005-04-02 1:51 AM (#20937 - in reply to #20893)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?



Expert Yogi

Posts: 8442
50002000100010010010010025
Jean - I learned by writing down my practice every day, going back to the books to get the names right. And I hear it in class, of course.

Bay Guy - the dogs are so much simpler! But Parsvakonasana/Side Angle Pose? Not much difference. Triang Mukhaikapada Pascimottanasana - well, it is a mouthful! But the English translations are all over the map. And what the bleep does "fixed firm" mean? So we agree - some are simpler in one language or the other.

Mr D - (I think it was Mr D) of course there are variations in the Sanskrit names but a lot less than in the English ones. One of the great traditions of yoga is that one teaches as one has been taught to teach. My guru says Sanskrit and voila (oops- French!) I learn the Sanskrit *bows down to BKS* However, I will not bow down to the jargon inflicted in my profession! I don't care how many people call themselves "edu-carers" (no, I kid you not, folks!) I will remain an early childhood educator, thank you very much.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Bay Guy
Posted 2005-04-03 9:07 PM (#21026 - in reply to #20937)
Subject: RE: Sanskrit: Do you get it?



Expert Yogi

Posts: 2479
2000100100100100252525
Location: A Blue State

Fixed-firm....why not just say Reclining Hero?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread


(Delete all cookies set by this site)